<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Computer Learns Sign Language By Watching TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pigjockey.com/2009/07/09/computer-learns-sign-language-watching-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pigjockey.com/2009/07/09/computer-learns-sign-language-watching-tv/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:12:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Jones</title>
		<link>http://pigjockey.com/2009/07/09/computer-learns-sign-language-watching-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-1721</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pigjockey.com/?p=422#comment-1721</guid>
		<description>&quot;Although this is a clever piece of technology, it still has a long way to go. Rather than working round the problem, maybe the researchers should concentrate their efforts more on making deaf people hear again. What do you think?&quot;

No all people who sign are deaf, many people who sign have speaking difficulties. Even so developing this technology will be much simpler and quicker than working out a cure for all forms of deafness. A stop gap solution is better than waiting an age for a complete solution.

One useful application on this technology would allow non-signers to understand sign language, it would, therefore be easier for signers to communicate with non-signers. I know a profoundly deaf man who can get by with lip reading in order to understand non-signers, however he is still left with writing in order to communicate with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Although this is a clever piece of technology, it still has a long way to go. Rather than working round the problem, maybe the researchers should concentrate their efforts more on making deaf people hear again. What do you think?&#8221;</p>
<p>No all people who sign are deaf, many people who sign have speaking difficulties. Even so developing this technology will be much simpler and quicker than working out a cure for all forms of deafness. A stop gap solution is better than waiting an age for a complete solution.</p>
<p>One useful application on this technology would allow non-signers to understand sign language, it would, therefore be easier for signers to communicate with non-signers. I know a profoundly deaf man who can get by with lip reading in order to understand non-signers, however he is still left with writing in order to communicate with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

